Sap transport tool ctc

In case you have two Q systems, configure a target group to the two Q systems, this will link your D system to the group by using one transport layer, in this way both systems will be recognizable under the same "standard transport layer". Depending on the patch level of the Solman 7.

You need to put the relevant systems into their corresponding system roles, ensure that the system entered fits with the real TMS landscape that you have. I mean ensure that there are consolidation routes defined from the source system to the first target system and delivery routes created between target systems and from the last target system to production system.

For non-ABAP system you would define a logical component like:. See more details in How to create a solution for Change Request in 7. Choose tab System Landscape and then tab strip Logical Components, enter your Logical component and save. Please see point " For Dual-Stack system, the IMG will be created in the development system:client indicated for the source system. Choose Create Task List. Enter it in the sort string value for the father and the child - - - ibase components:.

Please pay attention to note - Maintaining installation and system numbers in SolMan 7. Other technologies from SAP acquisitions are not familiar with this installation number. In Release 7. For other system types, you currently have to use a workaround. However, the numbers maintained there are not synchronized to SMSY in every case, which means that the workaround described here is not yet obsolete.

So in the case that you are not filling the installation number manually, then you need to implement note - ChaRM: no project can be selected when IBase of non-ABAP system is maintained. If the note is implemented even if the system in LMDB is not having an installation number maintained ChaRM will be able to select the correct project for the production Ibase component.

Refer to program documentation for details. Note: TR check tool. Hence it will be great to integrate this with SE I really need to add that I like this transport checker, but in my opinion it's something which need to be integrated in a process and not at such a place.

When people really care about releases and transports the tool is something which just make sure for the quality manager everything is really fine. Then we can make corrections before releasing the TR itself.

While experimenting with the program, we noticed that it did catch some issues which could then be corrected before hitting production. Here is an update: since January when upgrades happened for the ST-PI components, our weekly job is no longer working because it always abends when it wants to send a message to the GUI. I created an OSS-message but that has been lingering with some activity off and on without getting a solution in place. This happens after a couple of minutes runtime but it's not clear where and when because no dump is available in ST As we only have one short "window of opportunity" each week between noon and 3pm when import queues for production are filled and the check can be run meaningfully this has been consistently tricky to troubleshoot further both on our and SAP's end.

So this should be useful, I hope. One of the points that I noted is that in a standard table if. INCLUDE structure is not yet implemented then the report gives error of object does not exist in target system which is quite confusing.

Currently our plan is to observe report for a while and the we can submit all findings to SAP at once. Thanks for a nice blog, I was excited to try out this transaction. How did your team address this?

Are you able to use this transaction? Any insights? Because we have already integrated this transaction with SE10 and it works very well for us. It checks for error before we could import them to production system.

I have a report program which has CI include and in the current version of my program, I am not referencing any of the fields from the CI include, but the transport check tool shows me an error. Another instance is on the SD user exit enhancements. This transaction checks for all the cross reference objects and other enhancements and errors about other enhancements which will be moved later.

I would not expect an error in this case too. Change Request -: It is used to record the changes that are performed during customizing, cross-client customization and development. Change requests locks the objects and the locks are release once the change requests are released. So SAP introduced change request mechanism to record the changes during customizing and development and upon release, transport to other systems independent of OS and DB.

It is used to copy the change requests bw clients in the same systems for unit testing before they are released. It is used for client specific objects. TP—: It is a transport protocol which is used to export the change requests and import transport requests.

Change Request Release—: Release of change requests are performed by developers and functional consultants and once change request is released it is referred as TR. Transport directory is used for transport, support packages, binaries for transportation of requests, add-ons, languages, third party tools, upgrades and enhancements packages. NOTE-: Virtual system name and real system name should be same. If they differ then all the change requests have to be added manually.

It is used by TP to transport the objects bw the systems. PFL —: is used to provide profile parameters for TP. It specifies the profile, exe locations along with TP version.

LOG—: It is used to display the transport logs. These logs are stored in this directory. Secstore—: is a transaction which is used to check the RFC connections which are pointed to obsolete system. Execute Transaction SE80, select package and create a new package. Package definition requires the following inputs QAS is the system where consolidation of objects, testing, quality assurance, training etc is initiated, which is referred as Integration System.

PRD is the system where business activities are performed [without any development, testing and quality] which is referred as Delivery System. Please check SAP Note for further details. Note: For technical reasons for solution manager 7. You need to create a logical component, one or several, that contains the systems of the real managed landscape, enter in the logical component only the systems that you want to control via ChaRM, it is not required that you create a logical component that contains all the systems in transport routes of the managed landscape.

Logical component can be regarded as a projection of managed system infrastructure into SAP Solution Manager system, so it must represent the real landscape and the system roles should be consistent to their real roles in business scenarios the logical component shows different categories, Development system, Quality System, etc. Each category, column name, is linked to a type of system role such as source system, target system, production system, etc..

If you are going to customize the categories and add new categories by yourself, please make sure the Type of Role must be consistent to your system role. Note: Change Request Management requires at least two systems in the logical component, one as source system and one under category production system. Depending on the patch level of the Solman 7. You need to put the relevant systems into their corresponding system roles, ensure that the system entered fits with the real TMS landscape that you have.

I mean ensure that there are consolidation routes defined from the source system to the first target system and delivery routes created between target systems and from the last target system to production system.

This will be check during the task list creation, if the systems entered in the logical component are not consistent with the real TMS landscape ChaRM could not be activated for the project and you will receive the usual errors:. Decide if your project is an implementation or a Maintenance project.